HATFIELD v. WYNNE


178 A.D.2d 462 (1991)

Robert C. Hatfield et al., Respondents, v. Myrtle Wynne et al., Respondents, and Edward C. Leipziger, Appellant. (Action No. 1.) New Island Investors, Plaintiff, v. Myrtle Wynne et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant. (Action No. 2.) Myrtle Wynne, Respondent, v. Edward C. Leipziger, Appellant, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 3.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

December 9, 1991


Ordered that the order is modified by deleting the provision denying that branch of the cross motion which was to consolidate Action No. 1 with Action No. 3 and substituting therefor a provision granting that branch of the motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court, Queens County, erred in its sua sponte determination that the 1977 action to vacate the judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases