PER CURIAM.
Appellant contends his sentencing as an habitual offender was invalid because it was based on two prior convictions of the same date. Walker v. State,
Affirmed.
SCHOONOVER, C.J., and CAMPBELL and THREADGILL...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.