Respondent found that petitioner ingested cocaine based on positive laboratory tests, despite petitioner's argument that the watery and diluted consistency of petitioner's urine samples evinced that the samples were tampered with prior to testing and should not have been credited. To the contrary, as there was conflicting expert testimony on both sides, and as respondent established an unbroken chain of custody for the urine samples, it was within the Commissioner's purview...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
