STATE v. BISHOP


247 N.J. Super. 382 (1991)

589 A.2d 625

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM BISHOP, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 5, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Al Glimis, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant (Wilfredo Caraballo, Public Defender, attorney; Al Glimis on the brief).

Sandra DeLuca, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Paul T. Koenig, Jr., Prosecutor of Mercer County, attorney; Sandra DeLuca of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges J.H. COLEMAN and ASHBEY.


The opinion of the court was delivered by J.H. COLEMAN, P.J.A.D.

The focus of this appeal is upon the positioning of a passion/provocation manslaughter jury charge in a murder trial. Because the initial jury instructions on murder did not define the elements to require the State to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the absence of passion/provocation, the murder conviction must be reversed.

This appeal follows a retrial in which defendant was again convicted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases