Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, we find that the trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying his motion to set aside the verdict pursuant to CPL 330.30 and 330.40 without a hearing concerning certain comments the foreperson of the jury allegedly made to a court officer after the verdict was rendered. Since the defendant's motion to set aside the verdict was "based on little more than speculation...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.