1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 252 N.J.
  5. 252 N.J. Super. 361 (1991)
 

GUZZI v. CLARKE

252 N.J. Super. 361 (1991)

599 A.2d 956

KATHLEEN GUZZI, PLAINTIFF, v. RICHARD L. CLARKE AND LINDA J. COMANDINI, DEFENDANTS. KATHLEEN GRANDER, PLAINTIFF, v. KATHLEEN GUZZI, RICHARD L. CLARKE AND LINDA J. COMANDINI, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Somerset County.

July 10, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James A. Shafranski for plaintiff Guzzi (Lutz, Shafranski, Gorman & Mahoney, attorneys).

Heidi Willis Currier for defendants Clarke and Comandini (Connell, Foley & Geiser, attorneys).

ARNOLD, P.J.Cv.

There are two novel issues raised in this lawsuit. First, whether expert testimony is admissible to prove that a person's driving ability was impaired because of the combined effect of drinking alcoholic beverages and taking prescription drugs despite the absence of "supplementary evidence" of intoxication as that term is defined in Gustavson v. Gaynor, 206 N.J.Super. 540, 503 A.2d 340...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases