1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 251 N.J.
  5. 251 N.J. Super. 358 (1991)
 

STATE v. ZENQUIS

251 N.J. Super. 358 (1991)

598 A.2d 245

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. LUIS D. ZENQUIS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 29, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven J. Fram, designated counsel, argued the cause for appellant (Wilfredo Caraballo, Public Defender, attorney; Steven J. Fram of counsel and on the brief).

Mark E. Bailey, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General, attorney; Mark E. Bailey of counsel and on the letter-brief).

Before Judges ANTELL, LONG and BAIME.

The opinion of the court was delivered by BAIME, J.A.D.

Defendant was convicted of distribution of heroin (N.J.S.A. 2C:35-5b(3)). The State's principal evidence consisted of the testimony of a police officer who allegedly witnessed the transaction in the course of his surveillance of a "high crime" area. Prior to trial, the prosecutor obtained an order barring the defense from cross-examining the officer concerning the vantage point from which he allegedly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases