STATE v. ANAYA

No. 2 CA-CR 90-0110.

170 Ariz. 436 (1991)

825 P.2d 961

The STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Urbano Carnero ANAYA, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department B.

Review Denied March 17, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Grant Woods, Atty. Gen. by Paul J. McMurdie and Bruce M. Ferg, Tucson, for appellee.

Dunscomb & Shepherd, P.C. by Denice R. Shepherd, Tucson, for appellant.


OPINION

ROLL, Presiding Judge.

Defendant Urbano Carnero Anaya appeals from his convictions for aggravated assault and endangerment. Because a co-defendant failed to offer a racially neutral explanation for his exercise of peremptory challenges resulting in the exclusion of two black venirepersons, we vacate the judgment of guilt and remand this matter to the trial court for further proceedings.

FACTS

On May 8, 1989, deputies from the Pima...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases