ARONSON v. ARONSON


245 N.J. Super. 354 (1991)

585 A.2d 956

BERNICE ARONSON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. SANFORD W. ARONSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 16, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Francis W. Donahue argued the cause for appellant (Skoloff & Wolfe, attorneys).

Lewis Cohn argued the cause for respondent (Fox and Fox, attorneys; Audrey S. Stern, on the brief).

Before Judges KING, LONG and R.S. COHEN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by LONG, J.A.D.

In this post-judgment matrimonial action, defendant, Sanford W. Aronson challenges the trial judge's denial of his motion for a modification of the alimony he pays to his former wife, plaintiff, Bernice Aronson (now Bernice Rubenfield). We affirm in part and reverse in part. In so doing, we hold that income generated by plaintiff's inheritance, which is an exempt asset, is eligible for consideration in determining...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases