1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 231 Cal.App.3d
  5. 231 Cal.App.3d 349 (1991)
 

TISHER v. CALIFORNIA HORSE RACING BD.

Docket No. B053457.

231 Cal.App.3d 349 (1991)

282 Cal. Rptr. 330

KEVIN TISHER et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CALIFORNIA HORSE RACING BOARD, Defendant and Respondent; LOS ALAMITOS RACING ASSOCIATION, Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

May 31, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Craigo & Zimmerman and Richard W. Craigo for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, N. Eugene Hill, Assistant Attorney General, Henry G. Ullerich and Christopher C. Foley, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Respondent.

Mandel & Norwood, S. Jerome Mandel and Naomi Norwood for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

OPINION

SPENCER, P.J. —

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the trial court denying their petition for writ of mandate, certiorari or prohibition.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

Plaintiffs1 hold licenses as harness racing drivers issued by defendant California Horse Racing Board (board). Real party in interest Los Alamitos...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases