1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 123 N.J.
  5. 123 N.J. 457 (1991)
 

STATE v. MAURE

123 N.J. 457 (1991)

588 A.2d 383

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DAVID MAURE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RAYMOND HOBBS AND DANIEL HOBART, DEFENDANTS, AND HAROLD PETTY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided April 11, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Riaz A. Mian argued the cause for appellant David Maure (Voorhees, Bennett & Wherry, attorneys; Riaz A. Mian and E. John Wherry, Jr., on the brief).

Carl L. Taraschi argued the cause for appellant Harold Petty.

Stephen H. Monson, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Baime's opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 240 N.J.Super. 269, 573 A.2d 186 (1990).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7.

Opposed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases