1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 169 Ariz.
  5. 169 Ariz. 392 (1991)
 

STATE v. TAKACS

Nos. 1 CA-CR 89-1238, 1 CA-CR 89-1239.

169 Ariz. 392 (1991)

819 P.2d 978

STATE of Arizona, Appellant, v. Steve TAKACS and Cheryl Lynn Todd, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department C.

Review Denied November 5, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Grant Woods, Atty. Gen. by Paul J. McMurdie, Chief Counsel, Crim. Div., Lindy P. Funkhouser, Asst. Atty. Gen., Phoenix, for appellant State of Ariz.

Dean W. Trebesch, Maricopa County Public Defender by Garrett W. Simpson, Deputy Public Defender, Phoenix, for appellee Cheryl Lynn Todd.

Louis A. Moore, Jr., Phoenix, for appellee Steve Takacs.

OPINION

BROOKS, Judge.

The state of Arizona appeals from the trial court's dismissal of an indictment charging appellees Cheryl Lynn Todd and Steve Takacs (defendants) with multiple counts of promotion of gambling, a class 5 felony in violation of A.R.S. section 13-3303. We consider whether dismissal was required because section 13-3303 is unconstitutionally vague. We find that the statute is not unconstitutionally vague and therefore reverse.

BACKGROUND...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases