TRIPLE E PRODUCE CORP. v. VALENCIA

No. 2 CA-CV 90-0290.

170 Ariz. 375 (1991)

824 P.2d 771

TRIPLE E PRODUCE CORP., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Edgar VALENCIA, dba Engebretson-Grupe, Co., Garnishee/Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department A.

Review Denied March 3, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Larson & Soto by E. Leigh Larson and James A. Soto, Nogales, for plaintiff/appellee.

Johnson, Dowdall & Kleindienst, P.A. by Richard J. Dowdall and Richard G. Kleindienst, Tucson, for garnishee/appellant.


OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment in the sum of $1,519,865.33 against the garnishee, entered after a trial by the court. The garnishee, Edgar Valencia, dba Engebretson-Grupe Co. (Valencia), contends the trial court erred because the renewal judgment which formed the basis of the garnishment action was void and because Valencia was not indebted to the judgment debtor. We do not agree and affirm.

I.

The defendants in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases