The IAS court correctly perceived that the majority of the relief sought by respondent had been previously sought and denied, and thus properly characterized respondent's motion for such relief as one for reargument. Since no appeal lies from denial of a motion for reargument, this portion of the appeal is dismissed. There being no showing that the court abused its discretion in modifying its prior order with respect to restraints upon transfer of assets, that portion of...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
