BORGES v. HAMED


247 N.J. Super. 295 (1991)

589 A.2d 169

ALBERTINA BORGES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. FAIEZ HAMED AND LOURDES HAMED, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 17, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hector M. Garcia, attorney for appellant.

Edward J. Gilhooly, attorney for respondents.

Before Judges KING, R.S. COHEN and STERN.


PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff Albertina Borges says she fell on the sidewalk in front of a three-apartment house owned by defendants Faiez and Lourdes Hamed. She sued the Hameds for damages. They moved for summary judgment, and it was granted. Plaintiff appealed, and we now affirm, substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Francis De Stefano in his opinion which appears at 247 N.J.Super. 353

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases