Defendant was convicted after an undercover "buy and bust" operation, in which he was found in possession of some of the pre-recorded "buy money" at the time of his arrest. Defendant argues that the prosecutor engaged in an improper summation, but a reading of the record indicates that after objection, the alleged objectionable statement was not elaborated upon, and no impropriety is perceived. With respect to defendant's argument that the charge on identification was erroneous...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
