GRAMERCY N ASSOCS v. BIDERMAN


169 A.D.2d 345 (1991)

In the Matter of Gramercy North Associates, Respondent, v. Abraham Biderman, as Commissioner of The Department of Housing Preservation and Development of the City of New York, et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

July 25, 1991


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Reed G. Schneider of counsel (Edith I. Spivack with him on the brief; Victor A. Kovner, Corporation Counsel, attorney), for appellants.

Steven R. Lapidus of counsel (Wayne R. Smith with him on the brief; Lerner Lapidus & Franquinha, attorneys), for respondent.

ROSENBERGER, J. P., ELLERIN, WALLACH and SMITH, JJ., concur.


ROSS, J.

The issue on this appeal is whether the determination of the Department of Housing Preservation and Development of the City of New York, denying the application of Gramercy North Associates, for partial tax exemption benefits, pursuant to Real Property Tax Law § 421-a, was arbitrary and capricious.

In order "to spur new construction of multiple dwellings to meet a housing shortage afflicting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases