1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 251 N.J.
  5. 251 N.J. Super. 256 (1991)
 

CAFFERATA v. PEYSER

251 N.J. Super. 256 (1991)

597 A.2d 1101

WILLIAM CAFFERATA AND SHERYL CAFFERATA, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. IRVING G. PEYSER, M.D. AND MITCHELL S. CARTER, M.D., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 17, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Seeber, Bowkley, Greb & Zelante, attorneys for appellants (C. William Bowkley, Jr., on the brief).

Giblin & Combs, attorneys for respondents (Jeremy P. Cooley and Steven G. Schwesinger, on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, SHEBELL and D'ANNUNZIO.

The opinion of the court was delivered by PRESSLER, P.J.A.D.

The question raised by this appeal is whether plaintiff's medical malpractice action is barred by the entire controversy doctrine by reason of his pro se settlement of a prior Special Civil Part action brought against him by the defendants-physicians' professional association to recover its bill for services for the same medical procedure of which the malpractice suit complains. We are satisfied that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases