STATE v. CASEY

No. 91-1540-CR.

166 Wis.2d 341 (1991)

479 N.W.2d 251

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Duane D. CASEY, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided December 27, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the appellant, the cause was submitted on the brief of David J. Van Lieshout of Van Hoof, Van Hoof, Cornett & Van Lieshout, of Little Chute.

On behalf of the respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general and William L. Gansner, assistant attorney general.

Before Cane, P.J., LaRocque and Myse, JJ.


MYSE, J.

Duane Casey appeals his conviction for first-degree sexual assault and the order denying his motion for a new trial. Casey argues that a new trial is required because the jury verdict was improperly influenced by extraneous prejudicial information used by the jury in finding him guilty. The alleged extraneous prejudicial information involved a statement the jury foreperson made during deliberations to the other jurors concerning her own experience as a sexual...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases