1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 399 S.E.2d
  5. 399 S.E.2d 107 (1991)
 

STATE v. FOLAND

No. 62PA90.

399 S.E.2d 107 (1991)

328 N.C. 82

STATE of North Carolina v. Dean Darwin FOLAND and Matthew Ervin Purdy.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 10, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lacy H. Thornburg, Atty. Gen. by James Peeler Smith, Sp. Deputy Atty. Gen., Raleigh, for State-appellant and -appellee.

Malcolm Ray Hunter, Jr., Appellate Defender, Raleigh, for defendant-appellee and appellant Foland.

Robin E. Hudson, Raleigh, for defendant-appellee and -appellant Purdy.

PER CURIAM.

We initially allowed the State's petition for discretionary review of the Court of Appeals' holding that the indictments must be dismissed under the Speedy Trial Act, N.C.G.S. § 15A-701, et seq., repealed by Chapter 688, 1989 Session Laws. Defendants appealed and petitioned for discretionary review of the Court of Appeals' holding that there was no error in the trial court's denial of defendants' motion to suppress certain evidence, a holding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases