1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 403 S.E.2d
  5. 403 S.E.2d 102 (1991)
 

THOMAS v. BARNHILL

No. 9014SC478.

403 S.E.2d 102 (1991)

102 N.C. App. 551

Rhonda THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. Carol BARNHILL, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Decided April 16, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael E. Mauney, Durham, for plaintiff-appellee.

Reynolds, Bryant and Patterson, P.A. by Joseph B. Chambliss, Jr., Durham, for defendant-appellant.

EAGLES, Judge.

Defendant first argues that the trial court erred by allowing the chiropractor to testify about matters outside the scope of his field of expertise. We disagree.

Defendant objects to the following diagnosis testimony by the chiropractor:

Moderate severe strain of the cervical spine with complicating subluxation complex syndrome of the cervical spine with associated radiculitis and myofascitis. Moderate severe strain to the mid thoracic...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases