Plaintiff failed to demonstrate that it was entitled to an injunction barring the defendants from terminating an exclusive distributorship agreement between the parties for the distribution of "Rosenthal" tableware and chinaware. Plaintiff had the burden of establishing the likelihood of ultimate success on the merits, irreparable injury absent the grant of a preliminary injunction, and a balancing of equities in plaintiff's favor (Grant Co. v Srogi,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
SUR LA TABLE LTD. v. AG.
173 A.D.2d 325 (1991)
Sur La Table Ltd., Appellant, v. Rosenthal AG. et al., Respondents
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
May 21, 1991
May 21, 1991
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.