1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 247 N.J.
  5. 247 N.J. Super. 249 (1991)
 

UNION CITY ASSOC. v. UNION CITY

247 N.J. Super. 249 (1991)

588 A.2d 1279

UNION CITY ASSOCIATES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF UNION CITY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 4, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven R. Irwin argued the cause for appellant (Mandelbaum & Mandelbaum, attorneys; Steven R. Irwin on the brief).

Herbert H. Fine, for respondent.

Before Judges KING, R.S. COHEN and STERN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by STERN, J.A.D.

Plaintiff challenges the dismissal of its complaint seeking reduction of its 1985 assessment. It claims that the assessment was precluded by the Freeze Act, N.J.S.A. 54:51A-8, and, in any event, constituted an illegal "spot assessment" in violation of N.J. Const. (1947) Art. VIII, § 1, par. 1(a). The Tax Court, in a published opinion, dismissed the complaint, ruling that (1) the "spot assessment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases