1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 167 Ariz.
  5. 167 Ariz. 328 (1991)
 

STATE v. VALDEZ

No. CR-89-0313-PC.

167 Ariz. 328 (1991)

806 P.2d 1376

STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Antonio Escarsega VALDEZ, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc.

February 21, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen D. Neely, Pima Co. Atty. by Paul G. Lauritzen, Deputy Co. Atty., Tucson, for appellee.

Charles L. Weninger, Tucson, for appellant.

OPINION

CAMERON, Justice.

I. JURISDICTION

Defendant, Antonio Escarsega Valdez, petitions this court for review of the trial court's denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const. art. 6, § 5(3), and Rule 32.9(c), Ariz.R.Crim.P., 17 A.R.S.

II. ISSUE

Whether defense counsel's failure to object to the prosecutor's improper comment constitutes...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases