1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 466 N.W.2d
  5. 466 N.W.2d 22 (1991)
 

SMITH v. CONDUX INTERN., INC.

No. C4-90-1492.

466 N.W.2d 22 (1991)

Jackson A. SMITH, individually and doing business as Rand Patents, Inc., and Copperthorne Industries 86, Ltd.; and Copperthorne Industries, Inc., Appellants, v. CONDUX INTERNATIONAL, INC., Condux Corporation, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

February 19, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Terence M. Fruth, Paul M. Floyd, Linda A. Newbauer, Fruth & Anthony, Minneapolis, Kenneth E. Kuffner, Arnold, White & Durkee, Houston, Tex., for appellants.

Robert J. Sheran, David A. Allgeyer, Lindquist & Vennum, and John D. Gould, John A. Clifford, Paul E. Lacey, Merchant, Gould, Smith, Edell, Welter & Schmidt, P.A., Minneapolis, for respondent.

Considered and decided by FOLEY, P.J., and NORTON and SHORT, JJ.

OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

This is an appeal from a post-judgment temporary injunction and an order denying appellants' motion to vacate that injunction. After judgment was entered and an appeal was filed, respondents brought a show cause motion accusing appellants of contempt for violating the terms of the permanent injunction that was part of the final judgment. After a hearing, the court found that appellants had violated the permanent injunction, but rather...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases