1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 168 Ariz.
  5. 168 Ariz. 311 (1991)
 

PLATTNER v. STATE FARM

No. 1 CA-CV 89-091.

168 Ariz. 311 (1991)

812 P.2d 1129

Richard PLATTNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B.

May 28, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thur, Dawson and O'Sullivan by Calvin C. Thur, Mark Stachon, Scottsdale, for plaintiff-appellant.

Richard Plattner, in pro. per.

Ridenour, Swenson, Cleere and Evans by James W. Evans, Eric B. Gonzalez, Phoenix, for defendant-appellee.

OPINION

GRANT, Chief Judge.

This case raises the issue of whether an attorney can recover against an opposing party for interference with that attorney's relationship with his client, and whether the facts presented by the attorney here were sufficient to survive the opposing party's motion for summary judgment.

The plaintiff/appellant, Richard Plattner, (Plattner) appeals from the trial court's order granting summary judgment and attorneys' fees...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases