1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 474 N.W.2d
  5. 474 N.W.2d 4 (1991)
 

NOLAND v. SOO LINE R. CO.

No. C6-91-158.

474 N.W.2d 4 (1991)

Sandra Hattenberger NOLAND, Appellant, v. SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied September 13, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas M. Skare, Newby, Lingren, Newby & Carlson, Ltd., Cloquet, for appellant.

Patrick J. Nugent, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Considered and decided by CRIPPEN, P.J., and FOLEY, and DAVIES, JJ.

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

The trial court granted summary judgment to respondent Soo Line Railroad Company in a negligence action brought by appellant Sandra Hattenberger Noland, who was injured when she drove her snowmobile off respondent's railroad trestle. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

Appellant was injured when she drove her snowmobile over the side of a railroad trestle owned by respondent. According...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases