PAMELA PROBST, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE BOROUGH OF HADDONFIELD, CAMDEN COUNTY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued March 5, 1991.
Decided June 21, 1991.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Kenneth A. Sandler argued the cause for the appellant (Selikoff & Cohen, attorneys; Joel S. Selikoff, of counsel; Kenneth A. Sandler, on the brief).
Joseph F. Betley argued the cause for the respondent, Haddonfield Board of Education (Capehart & Scatchard, attorneys; Alan R. Schmoll, of counsel; Joseph F. Betley, on the brief).
Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney for respondent State Board of Education (Marlene Zuberman, Deputy Attorney General, on the statement).
Before Judges ANTELL and KEEFE.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
The opinion of the court was delivered by KEEFE, J.A.D.
The issue to be decided is whether a full-time teacher who is employed in a school district that has adopted a salary schedule pursuant to N.J.S.A. 18A:29-4.1 and has her employment and adjustment increments withheld for one school year pursuant to N.J.S.A. 18A:29-14 must be returned to the salary schedule in the next succeeding year after the increments...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
