RODIO v. SMITH


123 N.J. 345 (1991)

587 A.2d 621

MARIE R. RODIO AND SALVATORE J. RODIO, JR., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS, v. ROBERT WILLIAM SMITH AND ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS AND CROSS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 14, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David J. D'Aloia argued the cause for appellants and cross-respondents (Saiber, Schlesinger, Satz & Goldstein, attorneys; David J. D'Aloia and Joan M. Schwab, on the briefs).

Clifford L. Van Syoc argued the cause for respondents and cross-appellants.


The opinion of the Court was delivered by POLLOCK, J.

Like the companion case, Weinisch v. Sawyer & Allstate Insurance Co., 123 N.J. 333, 587 A.2d 615 (1991), decided today, this case requires us to determine whether plaintiffs' claim is properly construed as one for reformation rather than for money damages, and if so, whether a jury trial is available in an action for reformation of an...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases