1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 165 A.D.2d
  5. 165 A.D.2d 301 (1991)
 

HUDSON-PORT EWEN v. CHIEN KUO

165 A.D.2d 301 (1991)

Hudson-Port Ewen Associates, L.P., Respondent, v. Chien Kuo et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

March 7, 1991

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Herrick, Feinstein (Stephen M. Rathkopf, Arthur G. Jakoby and Sorrel Danilowitz of counsel), for appellants.

H. Clark Bell (Jerry A. Weiss of counsel), for respondent.

MAHONEY, P. J., and MIKOLL, J., concur with CASEY, J.; YESAWICH, JR., and HARVEY, JJ., dissent and vote to modify in an opinion by YESAWICH, JR., J.

CASEY, J.

Following execution of a contract to sell real property located on the Hudson River, a title report revealed that portions of the land were subject to a commerce grant issued by the State and a right of reentry contained in letters patent issued by the State. Although given the opportunity, defendants Chien Kuo and Helen Kuo (hereinafter defendants), the sellers, did not remedy these defects. At the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases