1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 117 Wn.2d
  5. 117 Wn.2d 348 (1991)
 

CITY OF TACOMA v. STATE

No. 56836-7.

117 Wn.2d 348 (1991)

816 P.2d 7

THE CITY OF TACOMA, Respondent, v. THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, ET AL, Appellants.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

September 12, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth O. Eikenberry, Attorney General, and Edward B. Mackie, Chief Deputy, for appellants.

Preston Thorgrimson Shidler Gates & Ellis, by Elizabeth Thomas, for respondent.

Katrin E. Frank on behalf of the Northwest Women's Law Center, amicus curiae for appellants.

UTTER, J.

The City of Tacoma filed a petition with the State Office of Financial Management asking to be reimbursed, pursuant to RCW 43.135, for costs expended in implementing the Domestic Violence Prevention Act. The petition was denied. The City then filed this declaratory relief action against the State and several state officials, claiming a right to reimbursement pursuant to RCW 43.135. Judge Arnold of the Pierce County Superior Court held the State is required...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases