1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Kan.
  4. 249 Kan.
  5. 249 Kan. 215 (1991)
 

IN RE McKENNA

No. 66,150

249 Kan. 215 (1991)

813 P.2d 929

In the Matter of PATRICK E. McKENNA, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Kansas.

Opinion filed July 12, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stanton A. Hazlett, deputy disciplinary administrator, argued the cause, and Bruce E. Miller, disciplinary administrator, was with him on the formal complaint for the petitioner.

Jack Focht, of Focht, Hughey, Hund & Calvert, of Wichita, argued the cause for the respondent.

Per Curiam:

This is an original proceeding in discipline filed by the disciplinary administrator against Patrick E. McKenna, of Kingman, Kansas, an attorney duly admitted to the practice of law in Kansas. A hearing panel of the Kansas Board for Discipline of Attorneys unanimously found a violation of Model Rules of Professional Conduct 8.4(d) and (g), Supreme Court Rule 226 (1990 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 290), in that respondent's conduct was prejudicial to the administration...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases