STRINGILE v. ROTHMAN


175 A.D.2d 281 (1991)

Gregoria Stringile, as Executrix of Thomas Stringile, Deceased, Appellant, v. Joseph Rothman et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

July 29, 1991


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff contends that the court erred in not permitting her to testify on direct or redirect examination that the decedent intended to continue working and that he did not intend to retire. However, the plaintiff testified on cross-examination that her husband told her, "[E]ither I retire or I get my own agency", and, the day before he died he purchased an agency ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases