1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 245 N.J.
  5. 245 N.J. Super. 201 (1991)
 

P.T. & L. CONST. v. MADIGAN & HYLAND

245 N.J. Super. 201 (1991)

584 A.2d 850

P.T. & L. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT-CROSS-APPELLANT, v. MADIGAN AND HYLAND, INC., MADIGAN-PRAEGAR, INC., AND U.R.S. COMPANY, INC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS-CROSS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 10, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven Backfisch argued the cause for appellants-cross-respondents (Whipple, Ross & Hirsh, attorneys; Paul J. Hirsh and Steven Backfisch, of counsel and on the brief).

Herbert C. Klein argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant (Klein Chapman, attorneys; Herbert C. Klein and Leonard A. Peduto, of counsel; Catherine E. Brown, Leonard A. Peduto and Ellen J. Goldfinger, on the brief).

Before Judges MICHELS, GRUCCIO and D'ANNUNZIO.

The opinion of the court was delivered by GRUCCIO, J.A.D.

Following a bench trial, defendants Madigan and Hyland, Inc. (Madigan-Hyland), Madigan-Praegar, Inc. (Madigan-Praegar), and U.R.S. Company, Inc. (U.R.S.), appeal from an amended judgment of the Superior Court, Law Division, entered in favor of plaintiff P.T. & L. Construction Company, Inc. (P.T. & L.), in the amount of $818,885.74. On appeal, defendants contend that the trial judge improperly failed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases