Defendant contends that the trial court erred in granting plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and denying defendant's cross-motion for summary judgment. "Review of summary judgment on appeal is limited to whether the trial court's conclusions are correct as to the questions of whether there is a genuine issue of material fact and whether the movant is entitled to judgment." Vernon v. Barrow,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
GEORGE v. HARTFORD ACC. AND INDEM. CO.
No. 9030SC930.
404 S.E.2d 1 (1991)
102 N.C. App. 761
Frank GEORGE, d/b/a Frank George Electric, Inc. v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
May 7, 1991.
May 7, 1991.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Creighton W. Sossomon, Highlands, for plaintiff-appellee.
Martin, Cavan & Andersen, P.C. by C. Walker Ingraham, Atlanta, Ga., and Alley, Hyler, Killian, Kersten, Davis & Smathers by Patrick U. Smathers, Canton, for defendant-appellant.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
