KOUTSOUFLAKIS v. SCHIRMER


247 N.J. Super. 139 (1991)

588 A.2d 893

JOHN KOUTSOUFLAKIS, AN INFANT BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, STAMATOULA KOUTSOUFLAKIS, AND EMMANUEL KOUTSOUFLAKIS AND STAMATOULA KOUTSOUFLAKIS, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS, v. WILLIAM J. SCHIRMER, M.D., JOHN DOES I THROUGH X, ABC, INC., DEF, INC., GHI, INC., DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Union County.

Decided January 25, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marc E. Lesser (Kronisch, Schkeeper & Lesser, Attorneys), for plaintiffs.

Jeffrey A. Peck, (Shanley & Fisher, Attorneys), for defendants.


OPINION

MENZA, J.S.C.

This is defendant's motion to compel discovery.

The question presented is whether a plaintiff is required to furnish to the defendant the identity and report of an examining physician who the plaintiff will not call as a witness at trial. This precise question has not before been decided.

Plaintiff revealed for the first time in her depositions that the infant plaintiff had been examined by a physician who had been consulted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases