1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 60 Wn.
  5. 60 Wn. App. 325 (1991)
 

HEIN v. TACO BELL

No. 24915-1-I.

60 Wn. App. 325 (1991)

803 P.2d 329

NORMAN HEIN, Appellant, v. TACO BELL, INC., Respondent.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

January 22, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael R. Caryl, for appellant.

Chris Howard and John Christiansen, for respondent.

PEKELIS, J.

Dr. Norman Hein appeals the dismissal of his personal injury suit against Taco Bell, Inc., for lack of personal jurisdiction. He contends (1) that the State of Washington has general jurisdiction over Taco Bell pursuant to RCW 4.28.080(10) and (2) that the 1-year California statute of limitations should not be applied to bar his claim pursuant to RCW 4.18.040.

I

Hein is a lifelong resident of Washington State with a graduate degree in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases