May a judge, after a jury has found the plaintiff's damages to be $20,000 because of the defendants' misrepresentations, find damages in the amount of $60,000 (prior to doubling) for a G.L.c. 93A violation based, in the words of the trial judge, on "the same fact pattern" which was before the jury? Our answer is "yes," and we affirm the judgment.
Although the defendants do not agree with the trial...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
