Petitioner entered into a home improvement contract with respondent in June, 1989. While respondent corporation did not have a home improvement license, both its principal, Christopher Clark, and C. Clark Construction Corp., an independent entity, did have one when partial payment was made by petitioner. Respondent demanded arbitration, pursuant to the terms of the contract. Petitioner moved to stay the arbitration on the ground that, inter alia, petitioner was an...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
