PEOPLE v. NANCE


175 A.D.2d 185 (1991)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Norman Nance, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

July 8, 1991


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in trying the defendant in absentia. The record reveals that the defendant was twice informed of his right to be present at trial as well as the consequences of failing to appear for trial (see, People v Parker, 57 N.Y.2d 136, 140). On the day the trial was to begin the defendant appeared in court but shortly thereafter absconded...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases