1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 60 Wn.
  5. 60 Wn. App. 298 (1991)
 

STATE v. ESTORGA

Nos. 12258-8-II; 12302-9-II.

60 Wn. App. 298 (1991)

803 P.2d 813

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. SHERRI ESTORGA, Appellant. THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. DONALD FRANK QUACKENBUSH, Respondent.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two.

January 17, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey Steinborn and James L. Carbone, for appellant Estorga.

Chris L. Matson, for respondent Quackenbush.

Arthur D. Curtis, Prosecuting Attorney, and Michael C. Kinnie, Deputy, for the State.

PETRICH, J.

In consolidated trials, jury verdicts of guilty for the manufacture of marijuana and for the possession of marijuana were returned against Sherri Estorga and Donald Quackenbush. Thereafter, Quackenbush's conviction of possession was merged into the conviction for the manufacture of marijuana. His verdict was vacated and a new trial ordered because the trial court concluded that a hearsay statement lacking the required indicia of reliability had been introduced...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases