Defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment pursuant to CPL 30.30 was properly denied, since the 24-day period between December 21, 1987 and January 14, 1988 was excludable as an adjournment to which the defense consented (CPL 30.30 [4] [b]). In addition, contrary to defendant's appellate argument, the court was not required to conduct a hearing on the motion, since the minutes of the adjournments conclusively established the excludability of the disputed periods (CPL 210...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
