1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 126 N.J.
  5. 126 N.J. 225 (1991)
 

MATTER OF KONOPKA

126 N.J. 225 (1991)

596 A.2d 733

IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL A. KONOPKA, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided October 4, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas J. McCormick, Deputy Ethics Counsel, argued the cause on behalf of Office of Attorney Ethics.

Douglas H. Burg argued the cause for respondent (Frank A. Ferrante, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

This attorney-disciplinary proceeding arose from a random audit of the trust funds of respondent, Michael A. Konopka. As a result of the audit, the Office of Attorney Ethics (OAE) filed a complaint against respondent charging him with misappropriation of clients' funds, as well as failure to maintain required records and failure to safeguard clients' funds. More specifically, a formal six-count ethics complaint filed in January 1988 against respondent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases