1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 168 Ariz.
  5. 168 Ariz. 177 (1991)
 

HOSKINSON v. STATE OF CAL.

No. CV-91-0030-PR.

168 Ariz. 177 (1991)

812 P.2d 995

Vicki Lynne HOSKINSON Through the Personal Representative of her Estate, Robert FLEMING; Deborah Jane Carlson, individually and as surviving parent of Vicki Lynne Hoskinson and George Glenn Carlson, Jr., husband and wife; Stephanie Dawn Hoskinson by her next friend and mother, Deborah Jane Carlson; Carie Lynn Carlson by her next friend and father, George Glenn Carlson; Brian William Carlson by his next friends and parents, Deborah Jane Carlson and George Glenn Carlson, Jr., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA; California Department of Corrections, a State Agency; California Board of Prison Terms; Robert McLean, individually and in his official capacity, and Jane Doe McLean, husband and wife; Members of the California Board of Prison Terms, individually and in their official capacities; John Atwood and Alice Atwood, husband and wife; Frank Jarvis Atwood, a single man, Defendants/Appellees. Rodney Paul HOSKINSON, individually and as surviving parent of Vicki Lynne Hoskinson, deceased, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, California Department of Corrections, a State agency; California Board of Prison Terms; Robert McLean and Jane Doe McLean, husband and wife; Members of the California Board of Prison Terms, individually and in their official capacity; John Atwood and Alice Atwood, husband and wife, Defendants/Appellees.

Supreme Court of Arizona.

July 9, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gonzales & Villarreal by Winton D. Woods and Elizabeth Peasley-Fimbres, Tucson, for plaintiffs/appellants Carlson and Hoskinson and the Estate of Vicki Lynne Hoskinson.

Haralson, Kinerk & Morey by Dale Haralson and Gregory G. Wasley, Tucson, for plaintiff/appellant Rodney Hoskinson.

Lewis and Roca by John P. Frank, Steven J. Labensky and Anne Rachel Aberbach, Phoenix, Bury, Moeller, Humphrey & O'Meara by David C. Bury, Tucson, for defendants/appellees State of Cal., its agencies and officers.

Slutes, Sakrison, Even, Grant & Pelander by A. John Pelander, Tucson, for defendants/appellees John and Alice Atwood.

ORDER

The Petition for Review came before the court at conference on June 11, 1991. On consideration,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Review is denied. Vice Chief Justice Feldman and Justice Cameron voted to grant for the following reasons:

The exercise of in personam jurisdiction is based on considerations of due process and on principles of "fundamental fairness." State v. Velasco, 165 Ariz. 480

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases