1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 306 S.C.
  5. 306 S.C. 37 (1991)
 

COUSAR v. NEW LONDON ENGINEERING CO., INC.

23495

306 S.C. 37 (1991)

410 S.E.2d 243

Wilbert COUSAR, Respondent v. NEW LONDON ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC., Appellant, v. M. Wayne HIGGINS, d/b/a M.W.H. Enterprises, and Tommy Mungo, Defendants, of whom Tommy Mungo is Respondent.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided October 14, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dana C. Mitchell, III, Jesse A. McCall, Jr., both of Mitchell, Bouton, Yokel & Edwards, and Robert P. Foster, of Foster, Gaddy, Foster & Fortson, Greenville, for appellant.

James W. Sheedy and William L. Ferguson, both of Spencer & Spencer, Rock Hill, for respondent Tommy Mungo.

Alford Haselden, of Haselden & Owen, Clover, and John E. Parker, of Peters, Murdaugh, Parker, Eltzroth & Detrick, Hampton, for respondent Wilbert Cousar.

Leland B. Greeley, of Brunson, Hayes & Gatlin, Rock Hill, for defendants M. Wayne Higgins and M.W.H. Enterprises, Inc.

Heard Dec. 10, 1990.

Decided Oct. 14, 1991.

FINNEY, Justice:

Appellant New London Engineering Company, Inc. (New London), appeals from two circuit court orders; the first of which denied New London's motion to amend its Answer and Third Party Complaint, and the second retained jurisdiction of issues not on appeal during pendency of an appeal from the first order. We affirm.

New London manufactured a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases