1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 247 N.J.
  5. 247 N.J. Super. 94 (1991)
 

BAUTER v. HANOVER INS. CO.

247 N.J. Super. 94 (1991)

588 A.2d 870

ROBERT W. BAUTER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 1, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rochelle Gizinski argued the cause for appellant (Richard A. Amdur, P.C., attorney, Marguerite A. Maggs on the brief).

Evan L. Goldman argued the cause for respondent (Mezey, Mezey, Goldman & Zublatt, attorneys, Miriam R. Rubin on the brief).

Before Judges DEIGHAN and A.M. STEIN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by DEIGHAN, J.A.D.

Plaintiff Robert W. Bauter seeks to recover under an underinsured motorist (UIM) provision of an insurance policy issued to him by defendant Hanover Insurance Company (Hanover). After discovery was completed, the parties cross-moved for summary judgment. On October 27, 1989, Judge Peskoe denied plaintiff's motion and granted defendant's motion for summary judgment. We affirm.

The facts are not in dispute...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases