Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant claims that his right to be present during the impanelling of the jury was impaired by his absence from conferences in a corridor outside of the courtroom during which counsel, after a voir dire conducted in open court, advised the Trial Judge of their peremptory and for-cause jury challenges. Those challenges were thereafter exercised in the defendant's presence, in open court. The defendant's contention in this...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.