Defendant argues that the hearing court improperly denied his Mapp motion, and erred in finding that there was probable cause to justify the arresting officer's seizure of complainant's wallet from defendant's person. The hearing evidence demonstrated that plainclothed anti-crime police officers observed defendant's accomplice divert the attention of the complainant, who was placing a call at a telephone booth, while the defendant removed a wallet from a ledge beneath...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.