1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 250 N.J.
  5. 250 N.J. Super. 79 (1991)
 

LOVETT v. ESTATE OF LOVETT

250 N.J. Super. 79 (1991)

593 A.2d 382

RICHARD R. LOVETT, III, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. THE ESTATE OF RUTH K. LOVETT, ET AL., DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division Atlantic County.

Decided January 24, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence T. Neher for Plaintiffs (Hannoch Weisman, attorneys).

Michael A. Orlando for Defendants Morgan Thomas and Thomas & Colaneri (Slimm, Dash and Goldberg, attorneys).

Edward Suski, Jr. for Defendants Morgan Thomas and Thomas & Colaneri on the counterclaim (Parker, McKay & Criscuolo, attorneys).

OPINION

GIBSON, J.S.C.

This is a legal malpractice action in which plaintiffs seek to recover attorney's fees allegedly necessitated by defendants' negligence. They also seek to be relieved of paying real estate commissions for sales in which one of the defendants allegedly acted as both attorney and broker. Although at one point, plaintiffs also asserted claims against the non-attorney defendants, those claims have either been resolved or abandoned.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases