1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 248 N.J.
  5. 248 N.J. Super. 73 (1991)
 

SCHWARTZMAN v. SCHWARTZMAN

248 N.J. Super. 73 (1991)

590 A.2d 246

MAXINE SCHWARTZMAN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. MARVIN SCHWARTZMAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 7, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Laurence J. Cutler argued the cause for the appellant.

Stephen K. Fletcher argued the cause for the respondent (Heymann & Fletcher, attorneys).

Before Judges ANTELL, SCALERA and KEEFE.

The opinion of the court was delivered by KEEFE, J.A.D.

Defendant Marvin Schwartzman appeals from a post divorce judgment issued by the Family Part, denying his application for modification of a property settlement agreement (the Agreement) incorporated into a final judgment of divorce and denying him credit toward alimony arrears dating back to the commencement of plaintiff's employment. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm the judgment under review.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases